Investigative Journalism and Learning Hub - Owners Prevented From Having Knowledge of Office Of Legal Services Commissioner Complaints Against Solicitor Adrian Mueller

Welcome to the blog of NSW strata investigative journalism

Primary audience on the website are owners (current and previous), tenants, investors, and potential buyers in large strata complex SP52948. Attempts to get Waratah Strata Management to keep all parties informed has been ignored since 1 February 2017. Strata files are kept undisclosed and even events like mediation at Fair Trading NSW, NCAT case SC 20/33352, Police Events, and OLSC reports about professional misconduct of Solicitor Adrian Mueller are not provided to owners (current and previous), tenants, investors, and potential buyers in large strata complex SP52948. Committee members and Waratah Strata Management refused to offer assistance to these organisations.

Number of SP52948 owners, tenants, and investors expressed gratitude towards this website as that was the only way to gain access to lot of critical information, which is not available in minutes and notices of meetings, or on Waratah Strata website.

The rest of the audience is anyone who might be interested in problems with strata schemes in NSW...

This website does not have any desire or intent to add own comments and therefore it is up to anybody to make up their own conclusions based on evidence and statements by others who did it in public forums, in courts, or elsewhere. All files on this website were provided to Fair Trading NSW, Office of legal Services Commissioner, NCAT, Supreme Court, and Police. The same files were repeatedly sent to Solicitor Adrian Mueller, committee members and strata managers - silence is their response.

Public is voicing strong concerns about problems with Tribunals. Issues with strata complexes and dubious quality of services provided by those who should enforce laws are common and frequent - examples: NSW-Civil-Tribunal-failing-to-deliver-services

Solicitor Adrian Mueller created dangerous precedence in two CTTT/NCAT cases (SCS 12/32675 and SC 20/33352) which, based on Australian legal system, allow other parties to use as valid defence (legal precedents). CTTT/NCAT fully co-operated with the Solicitor and effectively rendered NSW strata laws useless, and even allowed Solicitor's reprentation of large strata plan SP52948 without having any evidence of being approved by owners corporation (in fact, Solicitor was not approved at any legally-convened meeting).

CTTT/NCAT actively supported Solicitor Adrian Mueller’s predictive behaviour, contempt of court, falsified documents, and insurance claims in two cases in 2012/2013 (SCS 12/32675 and SCS 12/50460, conducted by Tribunal member M. Harrowell) and 2020/2021 (SC 20/33352, conducted by Tribunal member G.J. Sarginson). The precedence means that all evidence of the Applicant can be ignored if the Respondent fails to attend Hearings.

Tribunal had full knowledge of the Applicant's submissions about Solicitor Adrian Mueller, including ones dated 8, 27 February 2022, and 22 June 2022, which they completely ignored.

Democracy should be the leading avenue for managing strata complexes. But, democracy requires high level of sense and ethics, and right for all owners to have full access to strata files in order to make informed decisions. And when that does not happen, how to proceed? One way is to educate public and rise awareness that license to be a strata manager is one of the easiest in any industry: Strata Community Australia (SCA) are offering a three-day course on qualifying to be a strata manager with no prior educational requirements (apparently educational requirements are fulfilled by completing the course).

Solicitor Adrian Mueller refused to respond to email sent to Supreme Court and him on 20 April 2022:

Extract-from-email-to-Supreme-Court-and-Solicitor-Adrian-Mueller-which-he-did-not-reply-to-20Apr2022.webp

Extract-from-email-to-Supreme-Court-and-Solicitor-Adrian-Mueller-which-he-did-not-reply-to-20Apr2022-part-2.webp

Committee members and Waratah Strata Management refused to offer assistance to OLSC, so OLSC simply ignored the submitted evidence that consisted of 12 emails with 79 attachments.

OLSC also refused to view unredacted evidence on a secure website.

Here is an extract from a reply to OLSC:

"Dear Commissioner,

Thank you for one-page response. It lacked any response to my evidence, not even for a single document that I sent.

For example, on 16 February 2022, I sent an email with 41 attachments, and email on 6 May 2022 with 14 attachments: which one OLSC found to be "weak", "inconclusive", or "lacked evidence"? Or the three attachments enclosed herewith?

SP52948-evidence-submitted-to-NCAT-Supreme-Court-and-OLSC-premeditated-plan-by-Solicitor-Adrian-Mueller-to-prevent-Applicant-Motions-and-disallow-owners-to-vote-at-AGM-2017

SP52948-evidence-submitted-to-NCAT-Supreme-Court-and-OLSC-premeditated-plan-by-Solicitor-Adrian-Mueller-to-prevent-Applicant-Motions-and-disallow-owners-to-vote-at-AGM-2018

SP52948-Solicitor-Adrian-Mueller-failed-to-comply-with-Tribunal-orders-six-times-whilst-not-authorised-to-represent-owners-corporation-in-period-2012-to-2021

Disappointment is a weak word to express the outcome when my own life was/is endangered due to Solicitor Adrian Mueller and significant amount of money lost due to fraudulent actions by the Solicitor.

Solicitor Adrian Mueller even prevented 218 owners from voting at general meetings in 2017 and 2018 to force him to assist Police in fraud investigations (see attachments)! It appears Solicitor Adrian Mueller is either well-protected, or above the law. If that is the case, then let's stop stating that my evidence was carefully analyzed.

One would normally expect a response from a reputable organization like OLSC that addresses at least major items in my submission and reasons why they are rejected.

OLSC did not even attempt to ask for access to secure website with UNREDACTED files.

OLSC claims that Solicitor Adrian Mueller is legally engaged by owners corporation but there is no such evidence, nor it can be produced because general and committee meetings failed to satisfy SSMA 2015 and SSMR 2016 requirements (or SSMA 1996 in 2012/2013).

I also note that I see no evidence that OLSC office contacted Mr. Mueller for official statement, as listed in your document dated 17 February 2022: "However, they may need to contact the lawyer first so it could be some time before you hear from them. With our current workload, the initial assessment of complaints may take up to 6-8 weeks."

If you did contact the Solicitor (which I doubt), I deserve the right to see his "defence".

As listed in my evidence that neither OLSC nor anyone else can dispute, Solicitor Adrian Mueller created dangerous precedence in two CTTT/NCAT cases (SCS 12/32675 and SC 20/33352) which, based on Australian legal system, allow other parties to use as valid defence. Waratah Strata Management and committee members failed to inform owners about Solicitor Adrian Mueller’s predictive behaviour, contempt of court, falsified documents, and insurance claims in two CTTT/NCAT cases in 2012/2013 (SCS 12/32675 and SCS 12/50460, conducted by Tribunal member M. Harrowell) and 2020/2021 (SC 20/33352, conducted by Tribunal member G.J. Sarginson).

Coerce Tribunal he was legal representative of Respondent without offering evidence of valid procedure for his Standard Costs Agreement or legally-compliant meetings of Respondent,

Suggest to Respondent use of insurance claims for his legal costs,

Send secret defamation threats to Applicant before two Tribunal Hearings as an attempt of intimidation and deterrent,

Prevent Applicant’s Motion for Annual General Meetings,

Had direct knowledge of Applicant being denied to access strata documents, in spite of paid document searches and evidence of being legal member of the committee,

Not comply with Tribunal orders at Directions Hearings to submit evidence of behalf of Respondent (Solicitor Adrian Mueller failed to comply with Tribunal orders six times whilst not authorised to represent owners corporation in period 2012 to 2021),

Prevent Respondent from attending Hearings and coercing Tribunal to ignore Applicant’s evidence due to Respondent’s absence,

Actively support threats (even death threats) to Applicant, without taking actions to prevent such behaviour,

Bring no evidence at Hearings and deny/refute all Applicant’s statements (without offering any files to counter their claims),

Co-operate with Respondent to submit false insurance claims for his legal costs (four claims) in CTTT SCS 12/32675 in GST exclusive amount of $24,919.31 in 2012/2013 and undisclosed insurance claim in NCAT case SC 20/33352 in GST exclusive amount of $19,758.14 in March 2022,

Directly responsible for preparing falsified evidence in Statutory Declaration for CTTT on behalf of BCS Strata Management Peter Bone on 19 April 2013, and had full knowledge of false statements by Peter Bone in Affidavit to District Court case 2013/360456 on 31 January 2014, and not providing any evidence in Affidavit by Solicitor’s receptionist for case SC 20/33352 dated 8 February 2022,

SP52948-agenda-organised-by-BCS-Strata-Management-for-non-compliant-EGM-2013-to-engage-Solicitor-Adrian-Mueller.webp

Affidavit-by-BCS-Strata-Management-Peter-Bone-represented-by-Solicitor-Adrian-Mueller-to-District-Court-case-2013-360456-31Jan2014.pdf

Coerce Tribunal to enforce costs recovery from Applicant without approval of SP52948 at any legally-convened meeting, whilst being accessory to insurance claims as back-up option for his legal costs,

Attempt to justify non-compliant committee meetings dated 8 July 2012, 19 April 2013 (scheduled for 26 March 2013 and brought forward as time-warped event), and all meetings in 2020, 2021, and 2022 (CTTT dismissed Solicitor’s claims and declared meetings 8 July 2012 and 19 April 2013 ineffective in their decision in SCS 12/32675 on 6 November 2013),

Prevent Police, CTTT/NCAT, Fair Trading NSW, Office of Legal Services Commissioner, District Court, and Supreme Court from access to Respondent’s files and his alleged correspondence with Respondent."

In an updated submission to NCAT (CC-ed to OLSC), the following was requested:

"On 8 March 2022, we conducted document search for case SC 20/33352 and found no evidence of Solicitor Adrian Mueller's alleged correspondence with NCAT dated December 2020 and January 2021, in spite of careful check of all folders.

We reported our finding to NCAT on the same day (8 March 2022). Attachments:

NCAT-20-33352-file-viewing-record-8Mar2022.webp

NCAT-20-33352-submissions-and-document-report-from-18Aug2020-to-9Jun2021-for-document-search-photo-1-8Mar2022.webp

We also obtained certified copy of audio recording on NCAT SC 20/33352 Hearing and Directions Hearing, with irrefutable evidence that:

Impact

Solicitor Adrian Mueller involvement in NCAT case SC 20/33352 has lot of unanswered questions.

Apart from his personal involvement in obtaining insurance claims in GST exclusive amount of $19,758.14 in March 2022, he also initiated legal cost recovery through Supreme Court, where he declined to offer evidence or respond to inquiries about six dubious versions of his legal costs.

OLSC was asked to investigate misconduct of Solicitor Adrian Mueller and so far, they are of the belief that Solicitor was legal representative of SP52948. OLSC office was now asked for some proof of it.

Desired Outcome

To assist all parties, as I paid for document search at NCAT on 8 March 2022, I kindly request electronic delivery of the following unredacted emails, as listed in three versions of alleged work by Solicitor Adrian Mueller:

I do not expect to be charged for these files as I already paid for document search. If the above files existed, they should already have been made available on 8 March 2022.

Your prompt response would be appreciated.

We already wasted so much time and effort to prevent abuse in our complex, which includes serious financial problems (SP52948-effects-of-Waratah-Strata-Management-on-Balance-Sheet-from-31Jan2017-to-29Apr2022-with-chart.pdf).

Thank you in advance,

PS. Attachments:

NCAT-20-33352-file-viewing-record-8Mar2022.webp

Solicitor-Adrian-Mueller-invoices-for-NCAT-case-20-33352-as-per-email-dated-12Jul2021.pdf

Solicitor-Adrian-Mueller-invoices-for-NCAT-case-20-33352-as-per-email-dated-7Feb2022.pdf

Solicitor-Adrian-Mueller-invoices-for-NCAT-case-20-33352-as-per-email-dated-25Mar2022.pdf

CAS006791_1-Part-9-Questions-on-Validity-of-Solicitor-Adrian-Mueller-Legal-Cost-Items-NCAT-20-33352.pdf

CAS006791_1-PART-9-Strong-case-for-Solicitor-Adrian-Mueller-being-accessory-before-and-after-insurance-fraud-five-times-CTTT-12-32675-and-NCAT-20-33352.pdf

Costs-Respondent-letter-to-Ms-Julie-Wright-5Aprl2022.pdf (Solicitor Adrian Mueller refused to respond to it)

Six versions of Solicitor Adrian Mueller alleged costs in NCAT case SC 20/33352

NCAT SC 20/33352 extract from Solicitor Adrian Mueller alleged correspondence with NCAT without evidence of their existence"

The following document was also prepared and delivered:

SP52948-evidence-submitted-to-NCAT-Supreme-Court-and-OLSC-premeditated-plan-by-Solicitor-Adrian-Mueller-to-prevent-Applicant-Motions-and-disallow-owners-to-vote-at-AGM-2020

Examples of Solicitor Adrian Mueller and his colleagues refused to follow SP52948 orders or failed to deliver service: