Investigative Journalism and Learning Hub - BCS Strata Management ignored request to provide access to correspondence between SP52948 committee members and Solicitor Adrian Mueller on 4 February 2013

Welcome to the blog of NSW strata investigative journalism

From: SP52948 owner
To: Peter Bone BCS Strata Management
CC: Solicitor Adrian Mueller, Paul Banoob Pica Group
Subject: RE: ACCESS TO INSPECT RECORDS REQUESTED: SP52948 correspondence by EC members and Solicitor from January 2012 to February 2013
Date: 4/2/13, 5:55 pm

Hello Peter,

I do not agree with your statements 1) and 2).

For 3) and 4), I can live with it. In the end, I will claim expenses for all my hours for collecting evidence and costs incurred, as reported to you and the CTTT several times in the last two years.

a) The SSMA 1996 Section 108(g) is very clear:

    (3) Items to be made available for inspection
    The owners corporation must make the following items
    available for inspection by the person who makes the
    request or the person’s agent:
        ...
        (g) any other record or document in the custody or
        under the control of the owners corporation

The correspondence related to affairs of the owners corporation are definitely records that belong to this category.

As a reminder, the DFT summarizes some of the record keeping requirements:

    BEGIN QUOTE
    The owners corporation must record all details of notices
    given under the Strata Schemes Management Act or any other
    Act. Orders under these Acts, or by a public authority,
    local council or a court, must also be recorded and kept
    for at least five years.

    The following must be recorded for each notice:

        the date and manner of service
        the part of the strata scheme it is about
        the date for obeying the order
        the date the order was obeyed.

    The owners corporation must keep the following information
    for at least five years:

        details of motions passed
        copies of all correspondence received and sent
        notices of owners corporation and executive committee meetings.

    Proxies given to the owners corporation must be kept for
    at least 5 years after the proxy expires.
    END QUOTE


b) The Adjudicator can make these orders as per the SSMA 1996 Section 156:

    BEGIN QUOTE
    156 Order to supply information or documents
        (1) An Adjudicator may order an owners corporation, strata
        managing
        agent or office holder of an executive committee to supply to
        the
        applicant for the order information that the Adjudicator
        considers
        that the owners corporation, strata managing agent or office
        holder
        has wrongfully withheld from the applicant and to which the
        applicant is entitled under this Act.
    (2) An Adjudicator may order an owners corporation, strata managing
    agent or office holder of an executive committee to supply or make
    available to the applicant for the order a record or document if:
                (a) the Adjudicator considers that the owners
                corporation, strata managing agent or office holder has
                wrongfully failed to make the record or document
                available for inspection by the applicant or the
                applicant’s agent, and
                (b) the applicant is entitled under this Act to inspect
                the record or document.
    END QUOTE

c) As Strata Manager has an agency agreement with the owners corporation, they do have a Duty of Care to the OC under the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Commonwealth) in relation to the supply of services and in some jurisdictions under Fair Trading Acts (in NSW Property Stock and Business Agents Act).

d) I can also rely on the following SSMA 1996 Section 133 (c) and (d) through the Director-General to have a dispute concerning a strata scheme mediated:

    BEGIN QUOTE
        A mediator may disclose information obtained in connection with
        the
    administration or execution of this Part only in one or more of the
        following circumstances:
                ...
                (c)  if there are reasonable grounds to believe that
                the
                disclosure is necessary to prevent or minimise the
                danger of
                injury to any person or damage to any property,
        (d)  if the disclosure is reasonably required for the purpose
        of referring any party or parties to a mediation session to
        any person, agency, organisation or other body and the
        disclosure is made with the consent of the parties to the
        mediation session for the purpose of aiding in the resolution
        of a dispute between those parties or assisting the parties
        in any other manner
    END QUOTE

As you are aware, or should be aware, over the last two years these events made my DFT and CTTT cases even more serious:

  * Anonymous threat delivered in my letterbox (police case
    reported to your office two years ago with a plea to
    provide truthful information to owners, which was
    completely ignored). You have correspondence
    in regards to this issue.

  * My wife was attacked by a deranged member
    of the EC - Ms Sandy Quins. The witness was another
    member of the EC - Ms Maureen McDonald, the
    caretaker at the time, and one owner.

    Both EC members did not do anything to defuse the
    situation. It took police around two hours to calm
    this woman down on the phone. That was another
    police case.

  * Screened phone-number death threat delivered on my
    phone two years ago.

  * Other attempts of abuse, vilification, intimidation,
    and bullying for simply highlighting the errors and
    management issues. For example: I am very fond of
    the comment that I came from a "Communist country
    which did not know what democracy was", which was
    submitted by a long-standing member of the EC two
    years ago. CTTT has it in evidence.

When I call somebody a liar or corrupt, I provide EVIDENCE and stand by it. So far, I could not find anyone to counter my claims. Sure, my evidence in the past was not formatted in the way that some like, but that was just a matter of time before I learned how to do it.

e) In your Agency Agreement Number 2671:

   BEGIN QUOTE
   7.2 The Strata Manager may only disclose information that
   is confidential to the OC if:

   (a) it is necessary according to the law
   (b) it is authorised by the law
   END QUOTE

f) Automatically generated confidentiality statements in emails are not sufficient. You should be aware that, even if you state that you do not wish certain information to be published, there may be circumstances in which the Government is required by law to release that information (for example, in accordance with the requirements of the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009. Once we get to the CTTT case (I am confident that you will not attend the DFT case at the end of this month), I can ensure that access to this information is made public to all owners in the complex.

g) Upon my return, your office can provide access to the documents requested, or I can force it through even more serious means available to me:

   Subpoena for production and to give evidence

Regards,

On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 14:50 +1100, Peter Bone wrote:
> Good afternoon
>
> 1) Correspondence from J S Mueller & Co to Raine & Horne Strata is privileged. You are not entitled to inspect same.
>
> 2) Correspondence from executive committee members to Raine & Horne Strata that was prepared for the purpose of the Owners Corporation receiving legal advice or legal services concerning the CTTT proceedings is also privileged.
>
> 3) Raine & Horne Strata is not required to sift through and produce only specified records for you to undertake a book inspection. Raine & Horne Strata is only required to produce for your inspection the records mentioned in section 108 (except privileged documents).
>
> 4) must pay the prescribed fee before he is entitled to inspect any records of the owners corporation.
>
> Please contact our receptionist at strata@bcms.com.au to arrange a date / time for your inspection.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Peter Bone
> Raine & Horne Strata-Sydney
> Level 2, 51 Rawson Street Epping NSW 2121
> F: (02) 8216 0331
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: SP52948 owner
> Sent: Sunday, 3 February 2013 8:03 AM
> To: Peter Bone
> Subject: ACCESS TO INSPECT RECORDS REQUESTED: SP52948 correspondence by EC members and Solicitor from January 2012 to February 2013
>
> In accordance with:
>
>   NSW Strata Schemes Management Act 1996
>   QUOTE
>   Division 4 - Inspection of records and issue of certificates
>   108 Inspection of records of owners corporation
>   (1) Who may inspect records? An owner, mortgagee or covenant chargee
>   of a lot, or a person authorised by the owner, mortgagee or covenant
>   chargee, may request the owners corporation to allow an inspection to
>   be carried out under this section.
>
> I request access to inspect and copy the following records:
>
> a) All email and written correspondence by members of the Executive Committee sent to or received from the Strata Managers at Raine & Horne Epping in period from 1 January 2012 to 20 February 2013.
>
> b) All email and written correspondence by Solicitors Mueller sent to or received from the Strata Managers at Raine & Horne Epping in period from 1 January 2012 to 20 February 2013.
>
> I specifically do not need access to any other documents at this stage, so only those that I requested should be made available on the agreed date.
>
> c) In accordance with the law:
>
> (5) Time and place of inspection if agreement not reached
> If an applicant and the owners corporation fail to reach an agreement within 3 days after the owners corporation receives the application, the owners corporation must immediately send by post to the applicant a notice fixing a specified time (between 9 am and 8 pm) on a specified date (not later than 10 days after the owners corporation receives the application).
>
> ... I request the inspection of files be organized for any weekday in the following week:
>
> 25 February 2013 and 1 March 2013 inclusive
>
> Due to the nature and reasons to request this access to files, I strongly suggest and recommend that no evidence be destroyed, altered, or removed in the meantime.
>
> I am very satisfied with the progress of various cases I have raised so far, and more is to come. That is what is required to sort out issues in the complex and that is what has to be done.