Subject: Fwd: UPDATED OFFICIAL SUBMISSION PER SSMA 1996 Section 108 SP52948 Document Viewing Request on 2Sep2015
From: SP52948 owner
Date: 15/09/15 06:02
To: Greg Freeman
CC: Russell Young, Billy Cheung, Garry Mills
Sending to you specifically to prove that BCS Strata Management has problems.

http://www.nswstratasleuth.id.au/Greg-Freeman-COO-BCS-Strata-Management-Silence.pdf

That makes my job easier to pursue corruption and neglect of my (and other complexes).


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: UPDATED OFFICIAL SUBMISSION PER SSMA 1996 Section 108 SP52948 Document Viewing Request on 2Sep2015
Date:   Wed, 2 Sep 2015 21:17:51 +1000
From:   Sp52948 owner 
To:     strata@bcms.com.au, RussellY@bcms.com.au, Billy.Cheung@bcssm.com.au, garry.mils@bcssm.com.au

Almost three weeks passed by without any action on your side.

This comes in addition to the fact that EC had not had official meeting
for five months now. Dysfunctional committee, failing duty of care
and transparency tests.

1. BCS failed to acknowledge my request in accordance with the Act.

2. BCS failed to issue the invoice in a timely manner.

3. BCS failed to reply with details which documents they were not willing
to provide and reasons why.

An updated request for additional documents is enclosed herewith.
At the end of the month, I will submit the Motions for AGM 2015.

Mismanagement of the complex continues. Poor, repetitive repairs
without warranties, lack of major works in timely manner, delayed
payments, wrong payments, duplicate payments. Again, as in 2011,
electricity supply contract was renewed without seemingly requesting
tenders (otherwise, all owners must see the full details of the tenders).

I expect an invoice for document viewing within five working days.


On 16/08/15 21:39, SP52948 owner wrote:
As per SSMA 1996 Section 108, I submit the request for document viewing of SP52948.

Details are in enclosed document.

Act in accordance with law. BCS Branch Manager is fully supportive of my actions as per his
own email below. It is good that he feels confident of proper actions by his company.
Evidence tells the different story.

On 25/11/14 09:44, Billy Cheung wrote:
We have been made aware of the various allegations you have made against our office in regards to
the management of your scheme and also the so called deal or corrupt conduct in regards to the
tendering process of the caretaking agreement and the strata management agreement.

BCS Epping have been working closely with the Executive Committee in regards to the renewal of
our agency agreement and we have also offered to the owners corporation the service of our sister
company, Estate Managers in the tendering of the caretaking agreement of your building. In the
instance where BCS and Estate Managers had a vested interest in the tender on the above services,
it was essential that this process was managed solely by the Executive Committee to avoid any
conflict of interest. The EC has assured that this process is carried at arm length from the managing agent
and its associate company.

If you intend to pursue those allegations, you are entitled to lodge your complaints and submit concrete
evidence to regulatory bodies for further investigations. We recommend that you cease the above
defamatory remarks in public until all the facts have been tested and proven.

In regards to the various motions you have submitted, we have sought legal advice on the validity of
the so called motions and explanatory notes which you submitted. Based on that advice, the agenda
was drafted to allow an orderly and productive meeting.

As the Licensee in Charge of our office, I will be in attendance at your AGM to assist the Owners
Corporation on any queries they may have.

Regards
Billy Cheung
Branch Manager